![]() 05/22/2018 at 19:27 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The old Ford F-150 or a Bimmer?
I drove past the two cars who were parked on the shoulder. The F-150 had its bumper bent in, while the Bimmer...
...well. Entire rear end was caved in. This is why I prefer the older cars when I’m driving around the newer cars...the other guy takes more damage than I do. Less likely to see a total write-off by insurance.
Yes. In that regard, I’m an asshole.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 19:37 |
|
lol... me mum wrote off the garages loaner opel astra that way... backed in to a merc whilst getting out of a parking spot was all kindsa relieved when she saw the merc just had a scuffed bumper..... then she looked at the back of the astra....
then less than a week later a deer suicided into the passenger door of the replacement loaner..... that garage no longer wishes to do business with my mum
![]() 05/22/2018 at 19:40 |
|
The winner is whoever walks away. Personally, I’d prefer to be in the BMW in this situation as I have no further desire in my life to be my own personal airbag...
![]() 05/22/2018 at 19:56 |
|
The car that gets hit almost always ‘loses’. Not to mention the fact that the F-150 probably had a good 2,000 lbs on the BMW.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 20:04 |
|
While old cars might not look crumpled up modern cars are much, much safer than old cars where you are the crumple zone. Climb under my Camaro and take a look at the (nonexistent) crash structure sometime or compare how that BMW did compared to a 2002tii.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 20:06 |
|
But if you hit head on, that non collapsible steering column would smash your ribcage, and you’d die from 2 punctured lungs.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 20:47 |
|
A lady I work with got rearended yesterday - she was in her 3yo Subaru Legacy, the vehicle that rearended her was a 96 F250. Subie is surely a total, (though crumple zone technology probably saved their a$$es - it was flattened right up to the C pilar,) the F250 has some scratches and the tow hook thing is bent...
![]() 05/22/2018 at 20:58 |
|
That dissipated energy has to go somewhere. The BMW absorbs it so your body doesn’t.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 21:10 |
|
90s trucks are that perfect blend of simplicity and safety. Body on frame, solid steel, but airbags and collapsible column. And you can actually see out of the damn thing.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 22:06 |
|
But didn’t late 90’s F150 tend to crush the entire cab and scored so low I crash tests they were barely road legal?
![]() 05/22/2018 at 22:11 |
|
yeah, you are right, 150's smushed peoples legs... I’m thinking the 250 was stiffer...
![]() 05/22/2018 at 22:30 |
|
In high school (circa 1994, get off my lawn), my buddy drove a 1978 Chevy Suburban 2500 4x4. It was two-tone light blue, and we nicknamed it “El Cabrito”, because the son of a bitch could go anywhere; up mountains, through mesquite trees, etc.
Anywho, my buddy t-boned the Cabrito right into a brand new, limited edition Mercedes SL500 convertible in the school parking lot (we went to a very ritzy high school with very spoiled kids). Completely totaled the Mercedes.
It dented his front bumper.
El Cabrito was awesome.
![]() 05/22/2018 at 22:32 |
|
Was the T-boning intentional? :P
![]() 05/22/2018 at 22:35 |
|
It was not, actually. He was showing off his new cheapo sound system that he had rigged up himself while cruising the parking lot a little too fast. Failed to yield to cross traffic.
Also, Cabrito had a 454 in it. Torque for days. He’s lucky he didn’t push that German luxo-cruiser into another car.
![]() 05/23/2018 at 01:40 |
|
The 90s F-150 through F-350 had the same bodies. I’m not sure there was much difference between the frames.
![]() 05/23/2018 at 03:48 |
|
![]() 05/23/2018 at 03:48 |
|
![]() 05/23/2018 at 07:07 |
|
Stop crashing into stationary walls and it won’t be a problem.......
![]() 05/23/2018 at 10:11 |
|
....That’s a 2004-2008. I’m talking-92-96. Also, I mean collisions with another vehicle